Content taxonomy
Four content types are labelled explicitly, so professional opinion is never presented as a legal rule.
- Professional experience What has been personally observed or delivered.
- Analysis A professional interpretation of a subject.
- Guide Educational, procedural content.
- Regulatory information Based on legislation, Guichet.lu, administrations and official publications.
How we research
Official and primary sources take priority over secondary commentary. For any regulatory statement, the primary source is a legal text or a competent authority, never our own article.
Source hierarchy for Luxembourg YMYL topics
How we cite sources
Regulatory and procedural content links directly to the reference documents. Major pieces carry an "Official sources" list at the end. Where an article makes a claim a reader might reasonably challenge, the source is placed next to the claim.
How content is reviewed
Higher-risk topics — tax, law, funds, financial regulation, immigration, investment — are reviewed before publication. Where a second qualified professional has reviewed a piece, a "Reviewed by" line names that person. If no genuine human review took place, no reviewer is shown. A false trust signal is worse than none.
How content is updated
Content is reviewed when legislation or regulation changes and on a periodic basis. The visible dateModified reflects real reviews only. Modification dates are not refreshed artificially to appear current.
Corrections
Errors can be reported and are handled through a defined process. See the Corrections & updates policy.
AI policy
Technology and AI tools may support research, structuring or editorial workflows. Professional and regulatory content is subject to human review before publication. AI does not replace professional judgment on YMYL topics. confirm this matches your real process